Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

[DOWNLOAD] "Hannan v. Watt" by Illinois Appellate Court First District (5Th Division) Judgment Affirmed * Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Hannan v. Watt

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Hannan v. Watt
  • Author : Illinois Appellate Court First District (5Th Division) Judgment Affirmed
  • Release Date : January 12, 1986
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 63 KB

Description

Plaintiffs, both of whom are Republic Airlines (Republic) pilots, brought this action to enjoin the Chicago law firm of Cotton, Watt, Jones & King (Cotton Watt) from continuing to represent Northwest Orient Airlines (Northwest) pilots during the Airlines Pilots Association (ALPA) seniority list integration proceedings stemming from the merger of Northwest and Republic. Cotton Watt had formerly represented plaintiffs and other pilots, prior to their professional association with Republic, in similar seniority list integration proceedings and other matters allegedly related to their current representation of the Northwest pilots. Plaintiffs fear that such representation may lead to the disclosure of confidences reposed by them on Cotton Watt during the course of their previous attorney-client relationship and that this information could be used against them during the present proceedings. Following a hearing on plaintiffs' petition for injunctive relief, the trial court expressly found that while plaintiffs had shown that the former and present proceedings were similar in nature, they had failed to establish that the information communicated to Cotton Watt during their past dealings was substantially related to the current representation of Northwest pilots. Plaintiffs' petition for preliminary injunction was thereby denied and their complaint dismissed. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that (1) the trial court's finding was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and an abuse of discretion; and (2) the trial court applied an erroneous legal standard in determining whether a substantial relationship existed between the prior and current representations.


Ebook Free Online "Hannan v. Watt" PDF ePub Kindle